Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weight-loss restraint was mentioned by Weight loss Measure of one’s Food Perceptions Attempt (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of 16 statements obtained on the a good 6-section scale (never ever = 0/constantly = 5), which have high ratings appearing a higher level from restrained food. With the Eat psychometrical features come across Gather ainsi que al. (1982). The new structure coefficient for examples, the Mexican and you can Italian language of those, was of the same well worth, an alpha off 0.76.
Fat reduction restraint
Ineffectiveness scale. New negative connect with grounds try projected from Ineffectiveness Size out-of the fresh Restaurants Issues Collection (EDI) (Gather ainsi que al., 1983), which has shown good convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self esteem ) off Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Scientific personnel grabbed RepГєblica Dominicana mujeres the weight and you will top steps
Bmi (BMI). Bmi are calculated because lbs during the kilograms divided by the peak for the square m (Body mass index = kg/m2).
In advance of studies collection, good pilot examination of the latest Silhouettes Scale (Profile step one), put on an example comprising 20 Mexican pupils, was applied to check on the new appropriateness of one’s data to show looks items, so you can validate a great acceptation from a not known set of silhouettes and you may an obvious understanding of the tips (this new German class already measured which have research contained in this regard). The outcome presented the fresh new Silhouette Scale is actually a beneficial or an enthusiastic appropriate means to the Mexican test.
The fresh new detectives of the two countries, on Mexico City as well as Hae (standardized) techniques. The fresh new surveys was indeed placed on groups of medical and breastfeeding college students in the North american country and you can Italian language universities. One of the reasons behind the brand new ples out-of college students related to medicine is actually only the desire one to (you can imagine) these types of young adults have to have to the medical industry and for health problems, leading them to much more attentive to problems eg ED. Informed consent are obtained from all the data professionals. All the contacted youngsters offered to engage. The particular regional integrity committees approved the latest non-invasive processes. Elite group translators undertook and you will regulated the new translation and you may retranslation of instruments.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for
