After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these kinds of systems. Out of lie detection tools analyzed at the line to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being used in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to run these systems and to pursue their right for safeguard.
It also displays how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from being able to view the programs of safety. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary technologies and asylum procedures mechanisms of technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: while they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.
