101 . Newhagen , John Age. , “Beyond mind-report: Using latency to resolve design the question responding techniques toward web-based public-opinion surveys,” throughout the Sourcebook having Political Communications Research , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , R. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Pupil
102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John R. , “Political thinking differ with psychological traits,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is actually feminine very likely to vote having women’s products expense than simply its men acquaintances?” Legislative Studies Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil
104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Feminine Make: The insurance policy Feeling of females in the Congress ( Chi town : University out-of Chicago Press , 2002 ).Google College student
105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia A beneficial. , “Emblematic speeches regarding the U.S. Senate as well as their representational ecuadorian sexy women ramifications,” Journal out of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner
108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Would be to blacks show blacks and female show female? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Log out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Student
109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related governmental training while the detailed icon of women,” Political Choices 2003 , twenty five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Student
110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be good ‘gender affinity effect’ during the American government? S. Family elections,” Political Lookup Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This informative article could have been quoted by following the books. So it checklist is established according to research provided by Crossref.
Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A great. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Can it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise Both? A task Congruity Concept of Applicant Electability into the Transitional Tunisia. Views with the Government, Vol. thirteen, Matter. step one, p. 74.
Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Just who stereotypes women individuals? Identifying personal differences in female stereotype dependence. Government, Teams, and you will Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 94.
Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “Brand new part away from gender inside descriptive sign,” Political Research Quarterly 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611
McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and McLeod, Douglas 2015. When feminine assault. Government therefore the Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Question. step one, p. forty-two.
Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you will Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering mixed indicators: new character of gender and you will partisanship when you look at the evaluations off politicians. Log off Elections, Public opinion and you will Functions, Vol. twenty six, Matter. cuatro, p. 423.
Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Cardio and you may (No) Notice? Exactly how Users Negatively Infer Forgotten Facts about Politicians and just how This Affects the latest Research of one’s Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Material. seven, p. 972.
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Thinking regarding Women People in politics: Possible out-of Poland. Politics inside Central Europe, Vol. 14, Thing. step three, p. 7.
Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The utilization of Societal Part Principle towards Examination of Gender within the Politics. Political Psychology, Vol. 40, Matter. S1, p. 173.
Playground, Sun Younger and you will Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence on the Female People in politics: As to why Ambivalence Things to possess Gender Equivalence from inside the a beneficial Democracy. Record of females, Politics & Coverage, Vol. forty, Topic. dos, p. 309.
Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and Feamales in Politics. Corvinus Record regarding International Facts, Vol. 4, Matter. 1, p. 15.
Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Management on the Media: Gender Prejudice from inside the Chief Stereotypes through the Strategy and you may Program Moments. Uk Log from Political Research, Vol. 50, Question. step 3, p. 911.
Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how can People Assess Highway?Peak Bureaucrats’ Love and you may Ability? A good Typology and you will Take to. Public Government Feedback, Vol. 80, Matter. 4, p. 532.
