The newest questionnaire contains 3 parts. Region I integrated issues regarding socio-group study (decades, quantity of studies, parity, familial earnings, industry, latest relationship condition, sexual passion, reputation of HPV vaccination, and history of abnormal cervical disease evaluation).
Region II comprised of 6 questions about the prospective ladies who can be processed, years to start, volume, ages or criteria to avoid out-of evaluation, and techniques off evaluation. Just the users who had have you ever heard off HPV perform proceed to Region III and this assessed understanding of HPV of its sorts of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form out-of alert and you can avoidance.
Before the studies, the fresh new questionnaire away from area II and you may region III in the Thai variation was in fact considered, discussed, and you can changed up to consensus one of 20 experts who were all gynecologic oncologists (particular had been authors in other synchronous training). The experts rated every one of 19 concerns given that sometimes ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-peak Content Validity List (I-CVI) was computed for each and every product, while the Content Validity List (CVI) was computed if you take the common proportion out-of fourteen questions relating to information about cervical cancers evaluating and you will 5 questions about HPV. The CVI was in fact 1 for parts of the newest questionnaire (S1 Desk). The fresh accuracy was checked from inside the 29 women with the same characteristic given that members. The newest Cronbach’ leader coefficients toward precision was indeed 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical disease assessment and 0.907 to own knowledge about HPV.
Studies range
On the big date from booked colposcopy, the analysis assistant provided suggestions of your analysis into feminine whom came across addition conditions. The ladies exactly who provided to engage gave composed told agree and you can answered new survey separately by themselves ahead of proceeding so you can colposcopy.
Studies compiled for this analysis have been socio-demographic investigation (Part We of the questionnaire), knowledge of cervical malignant tumors examination (Part II), and you can knowledge of HPV (Region III).
Mathematical analysis
This new answers of real information throughout the cervical cancer tumors tests and you can HPV was basically reviewed of the for every single items just before scoring categorization. Proper answer is scored since the 1 whereas ‘incorrect and you will not knowing answer’ was scored 0.
Off 14 questions of cervical disease screening, female whoever rating have been ? 10 was basically arbitrarily categorized as the with ‘an effective knowledge’ if not was indeed regarded as which have “bad degree”. To possess knowledge of HPV, feminine whoever address is actually ‘never observed HPV’ was basically omitted regarding data off HPV knowledge.
Out of 5 questions, female whoever get was basically ? step 3 were regarded as with ‘an excellent knowledge of HPV’ usually given that ‘negative knowledge’. Out of 19 issues, women whose get was in fact ? thirteen had been categorized while the that have ‘a full knowledge’ or else given that ‘not good total knowledge’.
All of the research was basically amassed in an electronic database and you may reviewed playing with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were postordre Г¦gteskabs skilsmissesats utilized to research market analysis and you will have been described once the amounts which have commission, imply which have important departure otherwise average with variety. The newest connection ranging from for each varying and you may studies rating was in fact analyzed having fun with easy linear regression. Exploratory model was created inside the multivariable analysis along with all the details possibly connected with the knowledge rating. The fresh experienced number of analytical value are an excellent p-value of 0.05 or faster.
Results
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>
